About your Search

20130318
20130326
Search Results 0 to 1 of about 2
effects ever. >>> the plan is this. win over black and brown voters. >> a landmark voting rights case, it comes down to the highest court. >> here's something you don't hear every day. the political gridlock gripping washington is not ruining the country. we'll have one of the foremost voices on the country saying we should cheer up. >> he's been called the son of nevada. that state's longest serving governor shares his jumpy from the streets of chicago to the bright lights of the mega strip. his latest gamble, agreeing to be in the guest spot. >> plus, i have a new book out. you're going to love it almost as much as you love "the cycle." >>> question for you. can better outreach to people of color save the gop? that's what the rnc is placing its bet on. rnc chair reince priebus rolled out the 200 plus recommendations of the so-called 2012 autopsy report. wait, autopsy? did they die? any way, what has the gop learned from its campaign failures? a weak message, terrible ground game and excluding the voters is not how you win elections. that steve core knacky is 1-1. they hope to revers
in unanimous decisions like brown, in school busing, obviously in a lot of areas of extending rights to minorities. they were way ahead of both parties. you go back to the original civil rights raer and both parties were table because we lived in a completely racist, elite structure. and so the court was really one of the only elite institutions in the country that ran against that. while i understand the broader context, i think this is a supreme court that by that historical standard is late and that has fell behind as recently as the '80. this was a supreme court that was upholding states' ability to put people in jail for having gay sex. in 1986. not a long time ago. so they're late, they're behind and i think there will be a tremendous desire to find a ruling. maybe not 100% federalized ruling but to find a ruling that really cracks the door a lot more open toward these rights. >> you're right. the court is late on this. and i'm not comfortable with proposing this sort of state by state approach that jonathan is suggesting. because i think civil rights should not be decided by v
Search Results 0 to 1 of about 2

Terms of Use (10 Mar 2001)